Cut through the noise
I separate the use cases that will move your business from the expensive distractions. That includes a confident no on the ideas that won't.
Lutris Labs.ai
AI consulting
AI strategy for ambitious SMEs
I help ambitious SMEs separate hype from impact: a prioritised, costed plan of what to build now, what to build later, what to ignore, and why. You get a trusted advisor and a hands-on AI engineer in the same person: someone who has shipped agents, RAG pipelines, and production data science himself.
“AI is changing incredibly fast. I want my company to keep up and stay ahead of the competition, but I lack the expertise to steer in the right direction.”
What usually happens next is one of three things: you wait for AI to settle down (it won't), you buy Copilot licences with no use cases behind them, or a few enthusiasts experiment without a framework. All three burn time and money. And none of them answer the real question: what is worth building here?
Years of doing exactly this work: as a data-analytics consultant at PwC across banking, telecom, and public organisations, and hands-on as a data scientist and AI engineer. I built and launched an AI product solo (RAG, GraphRAG, the lot), so I know first-hand what ships and what only demos well. And because I teach at Nyenrode Business University and train teams for a living, I can sit with your engineers and your director in the same hour and make each understand the other.
Trusted by



I separate the use cases that will move your business from the expensive distractions. That includes a confident no on the ideas that won't.
Every idea is scored on impact, effort, and whether your data can actually carry it.
If you have your own developers, I train them to build the top use cases themselves. The training starts with AI-assisted coding.
Technical upskillingEvery engagement stands on its own and delivers value by itself. Each one also opens a natural next step.
A fast read on the gap between where you stand today and where you want to be. Stakeholder interviews, an AI-readiness scorecard, and a debrief. The low-commitment way to find out where the real opportunities sit.
Most chosen
We zoom in on three to five priority processes, your own people surface the ideas, and I score every candidate on impact, effort, and data-readiness. You leave with a short list of high-conviction, costed use cases, plus a clear list of what to ignore.
Everything in the Opportunity Map, plus a phased implementation roadmap, a deep data-readiness check on your top use cases, and budget and build/buy guidance. For when you want the full route, not just the map.
And after the plan? The goal is that your company can build without me. Until then I stay on as architect and sparring partner for your developers, and as trusted advisor for your management.
The map is one page. The value is the work behind it: interviews, a session where your own people surface the ideas, and a scoring I can defend line by line. So you innovate with AI on use cases that have already proven themselves.
Every candidate plotted on impact versus effort, flagged for data-readiness.
Three to five use cases, each with effort, rough cost, and the data it needs.
The ideas you can stop discussing, and why.
What to do first, what comes after, and who needs to be involved.
A session with management and your tech lead where I defend every placement.
The Quickscan gives you the scorecard and debrief. The Execution Plan adds the roadmap, the deep data check, and the budget.
The same four steps, whether you choose the Quickscan, the Opportunity Map, or the Execution Plan. Only the depth differs.
A kickoff workshop and short interviews with the people who know your processes best.
A use-case session where your own team surfaces the ideas. No imported best practices.
Every candidate ranked and roughly costed. Enthusiasm alone does not get an idea onto the list.
A readout with a concrete starting plan: what to do first, and what comes after.
A brainstorm gives you ideas. The Map gives you a prioritised, costed, data-checked plan, plus the no's. One avoided wrong bet pays for the whole engagement.
Generic tools give generic ideas. They know nothing about your workflows or your data. I read your real processes, and I know under the hood what AI can and cannot do today.
That is a result, not a failure. It tells you exactly what to fix before you spend money on a use case that would have failed anyway.
You own it, and your own people build it. If they need to get up to speed first, I train them. I stay on as sparring partner for as long as that is useful, and no longer.
Book a short introductory call. We'll discuss where you stand, which questions are on the table, and whether one of these three is a sensible next step.
Book a free introductory callNo obligation, practical, and no sales presentation.